This is about a week and a half late, but hey. I teach.
On April 22nd I had the honor and the obligation to go to the Maine Senate panel's hearing on the senate bill LD 1020 for gay marriage. Specifically, this bill's
summary states:
"This bill repeals the provision that limits marriage to one man and one woman and replaces it with the authorization for marriage between any 2 persons that meet the other requirements of Maine law. It also specifies that a marriage between 2 people of the same sex in another state that is valid in that state is valid and must be recognized in this State. This bill also clarifies that the authorization of marriage between 2 people of the same sex does not compel any religious institution to alter its doctrine, policy or teaching regarding marriage or to solemnize any marriage in conflict with that doctrine, policy or teaching. It also specifies that a person authorized to join persons in marriage and who fails or refuses to join persons in marriage is not subject to any fine or other penalty for such failure or refusal."
We arrived at the Augusta Civic Center with a feeling of dread; at every rally, protest or political event around this issue, I've been out-numbered, out-organized and out-voiced. This time, I felt a glimmer of hope. The hearing was set to begin at 9am; this is what we saw at 7am:
What an amazing sight....a sea of red-wearing supporters for queer rights in Maine. If you look closely, the people directly behind me and in one section of the bleachers are opponents to the bill (notice the .lack. of red) vastly outnumbered and looking distinctly uncomfortable. How does it feel to be the minority, folks? Not so good, is it? Many opponents brought children with them...and those poor kids looked like deer in the headlights. They were staring at us, mouths agape, looking like if they didn't stick right to their parents, we'd eat them alive. It made me so angry to think about what they've been told to be so afraid of us. In contrast, the kids that came in support of queer marriage were happy, laughing, hugging, and having a great time.
Over the course of the next 11 hours of testimony, we listened to both sides...and the contrast couldn't have been more apparent. To give you an idea, here's a list of the kinds of people and groups who testified for and against.
| PRO | CON |
| National Organization for Women | Individuals (some religious leaders, some politicians, and an endless supply of right-wing religious nut jobs) |
| Religious Coalition of the Freedom to Marry (line of Episcopal, Jewish, Methodist, UU and Congregationalists stretched and curved across the entire front of the auditorium) | |
| Youth & young adult groups | |
| Equality Maine & the Maine Freedom to Marry Coalition | |
| WWII and other war veterans | |
| Professors/Lawyers with special knowledge on the legality of the issue | |
| Politicians from MA | |
| GLSEN | |
Can you see how our side was vastly more organized?
The opposition had two arguments repeated over and over and over again (with Bibles to back them up)--three if you really stretch it:
- Equal marriage will lead to the death of marriage entirely, the death of society and order. (Wow...really?)
- Equal marriage will lead to the legalized abuse and neglect of children...not to mention incest and pedophilia
- "Just because I oppose gay marriage doesn't make me a bigot! Some of my best friends are gay!" (Can't tell you how many times I heard that line.
When you have to listen to 5.5 hours of constant fear, hate and wing-nuttitude, you have to combat that somehow so that you don't get up and take out a big can of whup-ass. It was hard to remember to breathe calmly through the hysterical screaming into the microphone by the opponents, so I spent my time writing down everything they said, because...well, you just can't make this shit up.
I've compiled a list of statements and arguments against equal marriage made by those equal marriage opponents for your viewing pleasure. Enjoy.
- Some, when they oppose gay marriage, are seen as a bigot; I am not a bigot.
- It's impossible for an egg to turn to sperm; a sperm to an egg.
- The fabric of the family will break down; homes without fathers will result. (Um...)
- Everyone knows it's not about love. It's about legitimizing personal and selfish needs.
- If we allow gay marriage, we'll be growing socialism!!
- When I look at this sea of red, I'm reminded of the Nazis at Auschwitz.
- First prayer was taken out of public schools, then there was abortion, then the commandments were taken off of public buildings. Now this. What's next?
- God made Adam's wife Eve, not Steve.
- Our forefathers would be ashamed to be discussing this issue! We need to go back to the foundations which this country is based on...the word and law of god.
- This definition of marriage goes against 2000 years of Christian and Jewish tradition! (Er....)
- In a heterosexual marriage, child abuse is less and kids are less likely to have sexual relationships; less likely to have gender confusion. (Dude! The APA has proven that wrong!)
- If this passes, we'll get more polygamy and multiple marriage contracts between multiple people!!
- Homosexual men live 8-20 fewer years than heterosexual males. If we pass this law, we'll all live 8-20 years less.
- If this law passes, it will give homosexuals unfettered access to children to molest them. (This is when we all stood up and turned our backs to the guy.)
- If we give these rights to everyone, they're not special anymore! (oh, classic.)
- We all know that juvenile delinquents don't come from strong families....(Love how that's just left open...)
- When will it stop? Marriage between three people? How about animals? You will destroy marriage! Nothing will satisfy them! This is a slippery slope! They want something they can't have!! (Imagine her voice getting higher-pitched and more hysterical)
- We have a loving god and a god of wrath and justice! If you want the blessings of god and me, don't pass this law. If you want his wrath, go ahead and pass it. God doesn't want you to pass it. (Oh, good...thanks for remembering. I forgot to call god before I arrived.)
- Canada passed gay marriage and now they want to pass laws allowing polygamy. We need to spend time on the economy; not this. (Um, one topic please? Could you clarify your insanity?)
- If we're going to give marriage rights to these people, then give them to me--I'm a single male and I could use those rights too! (Excuse me, but is that crack good? Did you smoke much?)
Whew. I cannot make this shit up.
The day wasn't all bad. We began the day hearing stories of love and devotion. We heard from allies of all ages and walks of life. We heard from loving couples, their children, government officials, veterans....I saw members of the hearing committee cry several times that day. The stories were so moving.
I sobbed when my Unitarian Universalist minister sweetie joined a line of about 130 ministers from all denominations to testify in support of equal marriage. They lined up in front of the panel two people thick and had to curve at the ends. And those were just the ministers who were able to make it to the hearing!
One boy next to me (we were in the front row) was crying at a point when an opponent was getting hysterical, and a committee member got up and gave him a box of tissues. Later, after watching the boy, the representative wrote him a note of support and had an aide deliver it. Bits of humanity like that were so moving.
Some good quotes:
- In response to "Okay, let's give you protections, but let's call it something else, like civil union": If we call it something else, it IS something else.
- How many of you who are legally married would willingly give that up to be "unioned"? None of you.
- Doing the right thing is always right, but not always easy.
NOTE: A huge legal loophole was discovered: many people testified that they filled out every form of paperwork possible (domestic partnership agreement, living will, medical power of attorney, executor rights...) and when their spouse died and the body had to be cremated, the coroner did not recognize the relationship and in some cases, the living partner had to ask relatives (in one case, a 96 year old mother with Alzheimer's in MN) for permission to dispose of the body. I want to encourage everyone reading this to make sure this loop hole doesn't exist in your state!
More photos of the event can be found on my
Flickr page. It's amazing!
UPDATE: Good news. As of yesterday, LD 1020 passed the panel and passed in the state Senate with .no. amendments. News is, it could pass in the House next week and get to the Governor's desk soon after that. Two worrisome things: our DEMOCRATIC governor, Baldacci, has not taken a stand on this issue and could decide to veto it, of all things. If the opposition gets enough signatures, they could force a "people's veto" vote in the fall to override the law.
Remember California? If we're not careful, we could have a repeat.